| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| e4566547 |
Posted - 10/11/2010 : 18:59:27
這是最近與朋友討論後，並且看過大本營論壇後想到的問題
穿甲體在穿透車體裝甲前
破片皆是往車體裝甲外噴散的
而在穿透後，則才開始往內噴散
此時，到此都還好
而問題在於
某些碳化鎢製成的穿甲體，能有效在穿透裝甲後造成碎裂
但對於一些更加強韌的穿甲體而言（或者是通過裝甲時並未受到太多的阻力）
它們能繼續往後穿透
而他們在穿透後方的裝甲的時候，後方的裝甲破片也開始往車體內部噴散
如此造成二次殺傷
那我想請問
到底是碳化鎢彈那種內爆能產生有效傷害
還是二次穿透造成的傷害比較大？
-------------------------------------
之前在大本營看到的科普
則是也有講到關於裝甲厚度產生的破片數量
只要達到一定的厚度之上，裝甲就算再加厚，破片數量也就相同了
也就是說除非被打的是極薄皮車
不然戰車與輕戰車裝甲被擊破後產生的破片是相當的
|
| 3 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| e4566547 |
Posted - 10/12/2010 : 19:17:06
那些修戰車的人一定很難受
戰損的車內的味道實在是．．．
此外感謝兩位先進 |
| Bryan C |
Posted - 10/12/2010 : 05:34:41
I had talked with a US Army Cav TC back in 1990s. He was TC of M1 and then M1A1. What he said that it wasn't the penetration, but the shaking/vibrations and heat done to the tank that will kill the tank crew inside. He said that it's easier to repair the tank than to replace the crew. So the REFROGER(Return Force to Germany) exercises usually flying chartered passenger planes with lots of US Army reservists and Army National Guardsmen that mostly are tank crew and others, to mate up with pre-positioned tanks in stockpile depots or get send directly to tank repair yards to practice "accepting" repaired tanks that would have "stains" inside with that certain BBQ smell.... |
| e4566547 |
Posted - 10/11/2010 : 22:19:31
原來如此，看來還是內爆比較有用 |
