作者 |
標題 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4105/d41059f3993463e8ed7d7b8a48e2612d4fd0bd12" alt="下一個標題 下一個標題" |
|
星艦戰將
路人甲乙丙
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt=""
Taiwan
1886 Posts |
Posted - 12/06/2006 : 05:26:18
|
最近南韓除了與日本發生獨島主權的爭議外,自9月起更與中共爆發了所謂的“蘇岩礁主權之爭”﹗
蘇岩礁,南韓稱之為“離於島”,為一暗礁地形,位於大陸東海北部離江蘇崇明島150海浬之處(N 32',E 125').自1880自90年代,此地曾一度被標識於北洋艦隊的航行地圖當中﹗1963與92年,中共海軍東海艦隊陸續完成了對於此地的地形觀測﹗然而在今年9月,南韓媒體卻突然大肆報導各型中共機艦在“蘇岩礁”活動的相關新聞,稱大陸有意奪取蘇岩礁的主權,造成南韓與大陸雙方關係一度緊張﹗
而據昨天大陸“中華網”的消息指出﹕南韓空軍自本月起,即在群山基地正式部署F-16C/D,到時與F-15K就會同時成為抑制中共海空兵力的兩大主力﹗而群山基地現有的F-5E/F未來會移防其他基地.看來南韓除了與日方在獨島的爭議不斷之外,如何也要同步審慎面對與中共蘇岩礁的爭議,均是南韓在外交上最棘手的話題﹗
Welcome to MDC force!
|
|
Kirov
我是老鳥
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b24/f7b242a01b242447704dd429f625d0ee67f907e3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b24/f7b242a01b242447704dd429f625d0ee67f907e3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b24/f7b242a01b242447704dd429f625d0ee67f907e3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b24/f7b242a01b242447704dd429f625d0ee67f907e3" alt=""
34263 Posts |
Posted - 12/06/2006 : 07:06:46
|
這一則新聞有可能是炒作成分居多...
因為這個問題早就不知道多久以前就被提上檯面討論...
問題沒有之前跟日本的那麼嚴重...
蘇岩礁問題的重點之一應該是它位置的敏感...
此次問題由南韓媒體挖舊聞引發,給人感覺有就是想造成國際上既成事實與對內政治宣傳的印象...
大陸會巡到那裡不是最近才發生的事,只是說最近領海、專屬海域範圍劃分因為被突顯了,所以變的受重視而敏感,以前多半由海軍負責的巡視,最近為了突顯主權象徵,也著手強化了非軍隊的海洋巡視監測單位(例如:國家海洋局、公安邊防海警)的力量,只是目前以東海為重點區域...
但是大陸十幾年來特別拼命蒐集的水文等資料...
除了早先認為的軍事用途外...
在近幾年來海域劃分、海底資源等問題漸漸顯得重要後...
也成為了將來向聯合國提出大陸架地形地質等詳細資料的重要基礎...
───
Darth Vader:
You can fear the power of dark side~!
Nothing compared the dark side~! |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adbbc/adbbcc924c8c99a162218db95846659d006c2804" alt="Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page" |
|
星艦戰將
路人甲乙丙
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt=""
Taiwan
1886 Posts |
|
陸戰屋小步兵
版主
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt=""
7782 Posts |
Posted - 12/08/2006 : 15:56:38
|
請教一下 海上平台的法律地位怎麼算? 和船隻同級嗎?
船隻算是領土的延伸 那麼平台就算是領土?
如果在公海上搭個平台,那不就可以把海洋權益再延伸?
領兵一隊衛南疆 步兵工兵屯田兵 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adbbc/adbbcc924c8c99a162218db95846659d006c2804" alt="Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page" |
|
dasha
版主
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt=""
41921 Posts |
Posted - 12/08/2006 : 16:21:03
|
技術上,海上平台通常就是船隻,會浮的,最大前進速度大概都在10kt以下就是,所以其意義與船隻相同,而同樣的也可以拖走.真的固定在海床上的平台,基本上在領海內還罷了,外海通常是技術上固定不了...... |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adbbc/adbbcc924c8c99a162218db95846659d006c2804" alt="Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page" |
|
BADGER
新手上路
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da699/da699e4356aa1ae920e4b9face48db347cd622c9" alt=""
China
92 Posts |
|
cchs
路人甲乙丙
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt=""
Taiwan
2212 Posts |
|
玄史生
路人甲乙丙
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f57b2/f57b2681a643f3530a15d001d84ac91ff77f9fc3" alt=""
Taiwan
1484 Posts |
|
dasha
版主
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8808/c8808b359feb90a2d9082f8afcc5dc281aa7abeb" alt=""
41921 Posts |
Posted - 12/11/2006 : 08:13:51
|
水面下4.5m?這根本說不上島,蓋甚都沒有法律效力.日本那幾個有爭議的礁至少退潮時還在海面上,這個比較沒話講,確實是有效的島. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adbbc/adbbcc924c8c99a162218db95846659d006c2804" alt="Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page" |
|
|
標題 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4105/d41059f3993463e8ed7d7b8a48e2612d4fd0bd12" alt="下一個標題 下一個標題" |
|