| 作者 |
 標題  |
|
|
閒遊之人
我是老鳥
6811 Posts |
 Posted - 04/14/2009 : 21:52:49
|
之前看討論有提到
使用海獵鷹那類可垂降機
後勤吃很兇
然而因為個人對其沒概念
因此如果以經國號為基準
各類可垂降定翼機
的後勤需求和經國號相比差多少阿~~~
因為曾想過搞一個機動整備班
用來露天整被垂降機(最低限的整備主要是掛彈補油)
然而卻不知這個單位需要多少人物資和裝備...... |
|
|
dasha
版主
41804 Posts |
Posted - 04/14/2009 : 22:24:19
|
大部分直升機因為是設計給陸軍的,那個都還好,沒有IDF麻煩.F-35B還在試飛就先排除,Harrier維修等級是1960年代的,現在來看其實是很煩的飛機,不過對修過F-100/104的人來說,大概還算普通,只是出勤沒多久就回家,你說一天花三小時修一次比較煩,還是一天修三次每次一小時比較煩?更何況有些檢查一定是飛出去一次就要做一次,航程短持續時間短的飛機就是煩......
Yak的名聲好像更壞就是.
吉屋出售
台北市基隆路二段套房,近台大及捷運,附近有黃昏市場,生活機能便利.
http://www.hbhousing.com.tw/web/A002/index.asp?module=search&file=Detail&No=Z087382%20%20%20&AID=A002
台北縣板橋市大觀路一二樓公寓,接近國小至大學各級學校及公車總站,離捷運及板橋車站不遠.
詳情請洽0931043559田小姐 |
 |
|
|
toga
版主
Tajikistan
12781 Posts |
Posted - 04/14/2009 : 23:16:41
|
根據老美海陸的使用經驗，海獵鷹的嚴重空難失事機率，一言以敝之：＂勇冠三軍＂.......
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/archive/index.php?t-2035.html
Marine Corps' "Widow-Maker": Harrier Attack Jet
(Source: Los Angeles Times; issued Dec. 13, 2002)
LOS ANGELES---On Sunday, Dec. 15, the Los Angeles Times will launch a major four-part series, "The Vertical Vision," chronicling the troubled history of the most dangerous airplane flying in the U.S. military today -- the Marine Corps' Harrier attack jet.
Known among some Marine aviators as "The Widow-Maker," the Harrier was originally produced by the British to perform short and vertical takeoffs and landings from remote clearings and glens.
Among the findings reported by Times staff writers Alan C. Miller in Washington, D.C., and Kevin Sack in Atlanta are:
--The Harrier has killed some of the country's most accomplished and promising Marine aviators. Many of those deaths were preventable.
--The airplane has suffered the highest major accident rate of any Air Force, Army, Navy or Marine plane now in service.
--The Harrier has failed to make a significant and distinctive contribution on the battlefield.
--Despite the Harrier's controversial history, the Marines are pushing ahead with a new generation of vertical-lift aircraft, including the V-22 Osprey troop transport whose revolutionary technology also has had deadly side effects.
 |
|
|
|
Steve Su
路人甲乙丙
2195 Posts |
Posted - 04/15/2009 : 10:03:25
|
>>因此如果以經國號為基準
>>各類可垂降定翼機
>>的後勤需求和經國號相比差多少阿~~~
IDF在設計之時就有引進方便地勤維修的觀念，服役後打破
過去修護大隊在F-5E/F上的內部比賽紀錄~F-5E/F只要兩名熟練
的地勤人員就可以在20分鐘內更換一具J-85，IDF的時間比F-5又短上許多~
不過不敢講十幾分是到那裡；雖然說F-5要把發動機拖出來還要拆掉尾管結構．
其次是IDF的維修便利性太高，曾經有人直接開車去台中拿零件，因為在不趕快
把每架戰機都整理好會影響到主官的升遷考核．
所以拿IDF的人工維修時數和其便利性和HARRIER相比，後者的地勤會罵三字經後
不爽和前者比.... |
|
|
| |
標題 |
|
|
|
戰機後勤的問題?
