| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Reinherd Von Hwang提督 |
Posted - 07/27/2013 : 10:42:53
我想問這個問題是因為
目前美國海軍和海軍陸戰隊不再編制8吋榴彈砲（M110)
改用MLRS或是輪車版本的HIMARS作為軍/師級的火力支援
但是美國的盟國 例如日本自衛隊 還是保有M110八吋榴彈砲 （包含台灣）
相較於八吋榴彈砲
多管火箭有較長的射程 （40km vs 21km) 較大的火力密度
但是長時間的火力壓制又遜於八吋榴（多管火箭彈藥消耗量過大 散佈面過大）
所以我好奇 如果沒有如美軍般強大的密接空中支援能量
多管火箭能否取代8吋榴彈砲作為大面積轟擊的火力支援武器？
|
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| SK2x2 |
Posted - 07/29/2013 : 10:54:18
GMLRS would help for most of the cases, relatively cheap, reliable, and accurate
For JGSDF, the most probable reason could be cost of replacing it...
|
| Shippy |
Posted - 07/27/2013 : 11:04:45
I personally think no except for US forces. It is because of the cost operating MLRS would be much greater especially when guided rounds are used. Also, most forces doesn't possess CAS abilities comparable to US, the ability of sustain firing would be much more pronounced. |
|
|
